Well since I caught a flu I happened to have more time to write something on my blog. And this time I wanted to write about University. As you know I`m studying in Warwick, at some rankings 3rd university in UK, in business even 1st one. So, what do I feel like studying here?
Campus vs non campus university
As opposed to Vilnius University where I had my bachelors degree, Warwick is campus university. It means all University facilities are in one place. I can have lectures in one building, after that go to the library, to the swimming pool in sports centre, visit friends in dormitories within a walking distance. The good thing is that in campus there are not only university studying buildings but all other services that a student might require.
There is a nightclub, quite a few bars, sports centre with swimming pool, basketball courts, tennis, food shop and even church for Christians and mosque for Muslims. In other words - campus itself is like a small town and sometimes it happens that students live there and don't really get out to the "outside world".
My opinion - campus university totally makes sense, it is so much more comfortable, the atmosphere is much better and so much time can be saved.
But...
There is one problem - I don't live on campus! The university apparently admits more people than they have dormitories and so I have to live outside and each day take a bus which is quite annoying because public transport in Coventry is not keeping to timetables at all, so I don't have the possibility to feel all the advantages of living on campus.
Teaching methods
Unfortunately, in Vilnius University I did not get a lot of chance to experience high quality lectures in terms of presentation of information. There were a few exceptionally good lecturers (i.e. business English lecturer) but most of other time it was about lecturer speaking and students writing down or some lecturers would even not prepare lectures but give away topics for students to prepare and wash their hands free from working.
I am studying only for 1,5 months only in Warwick but I already noticed a few patterns.
1. Around 1/3 of lectures are given by external speakers
By saying externals I mean not employees of University. They work in the area of the field and as I understand - in good positions. For example if we speak about design - a guy who designs Jaguar cars come, if we speak how much to invest to innovation - a guy from 3M comes, if we speak about protection of technology (patents and etc) - a guy from the government comes. And most importantly - they come prepared. As far as I know all these speakers are participating in the lecture not for the first and most probably not for the last time. So, I am really happy about all these externals cause they make sure that all material given is 100% practical.
Of course, such involvement of externals makes the main lecturer loose control over material given. And sometimes it happens that external speaker moves a little away from the main point of the lecture (I noticed they lack a little information of what was said before them for the students) but even in that case the information they provide is high class and extremely interesting.
2. Games, simulations, case studies
The lecturers here really like to follow up on the information they have given to us by various games. That`s again around 1/3 of the lecture time is being spent by students playing and preparing something.
And usually the games are good! I mean in AIESEC I participated in quite a few conferences and we used this method of teaching through games quite a lot. However, here a few games left really good impression for me. One of the reasons could be the fact that my team won, but I also think they were good games. Simulates really true conditions and changing environment. And the teams are always as international as possible. For example I have been only once in such games in one team with another European student.
3. Lectures by the lecturer himself/herself
Even here there is a variety of methods used. During the lecture anything can happen. For example we could be seeing a film on the topic. Of course if the film is just a person talking (happened one time) it is just really boring, but if it is well produced - it is really good way to present information. For example in product design we watched a show which was broadcasted last year on BBC. It is called "Design for life". I totally recommend to watch it, was really interesting for me.
4.Tests? Exams? No, Assignments!
Yap, you don't get to write tests or exams here. There is no material to learn by heart or store anything in my head. To get a mark after the lectures are finished I have write an assignment.
What is an assignment? It is basically a paper 5000 words long on the topic of lectures. Usually I can choose the topic from few examples.
I think this makes sense cause in life we will have to create something to show our knowledge, there will be noone examining us. On the other hand, there is a minus in Warwick that we are given no chance to present and defend our assignments for lecturers. They are just submitted and then lecturer reads and evaluates.
So far - these are my impressions from Warwick, to be continued soon!
Thanks for sharing this, Rytis!
ReplyDeleteEnjoy the new adventure, it seems a really cool experience!
See you soon in Paris?
Bisous,
Alisa
Interesting experience indeed.
ReplyDeleteDo you think you could bring such culture to Lithuanian universities? Or is it utopia? : )
Alisa, I thought you were supposed to come to Coventry? :)
ReplyDeleteAndriau, I don't think it is an utopia but change is a difficult process, I am not even sure from where to start.
Let`s make some project?:)
ReplyDeleteI believe that we simply need a generation change, so it may take a while.
Ryti, please continue writing, it is indeed interesting!
It is very interesting to read! What is about carrer opportunities for the students: does your university have relations with business? are the alumnis appreciable by the employers?
ReplyDelete